Skip to content
Verantrix

Progress

Keep your next study session focused

What you have done, what keeps coming back, and what is worth doing next. Enough to decide where an hour goes.

What you can see

Your answers, how confident you were, how long you spent, and whether you changed your mind. Individually these are small. Together they are what turns “I keep getting these wrong” into something specific enough to practise.

Reviews you have completed, rather than reviews you were assigned: a correction only counts once you have actually done it.

Whether a pattern you were working on is showing up less often than it used to.

Where the evidence is thin, it says so

Two questions are not a trend. When there is not enough behind an observation, it is shown as not enough rather than rounded up into a conclusion, because a confident reading of three attempts would send you off to fix something that may not be there.

Some of what you see is a reading rather than a measurement, and it is labelled that way. How your reasoning is developing is a judgement; how many reviews you completed is a count. Presenting the first with the precision of the second would be inventing precision.

What it will not tell you

It does not predict a GAMSAT score, and it will not produce a percentile against other candidates. We have no basis for either, and a number without a basis is worse than no number because you would plan around it.

For the official picture of how the examination is scored and reported, go to ACER’s own materials. Verantrix is independent of ACER and is not a source of official information.

See where the evidence comes from

Do a few questions and see what shows up.

Join the free beta